Study Notes
Judicial Restraint
- Level:
- A-Level
- Board:
- AQA, Edexcel, OCR, IB
Last updated 22 Mar 2021
Judicial Restraint is the belief that justices should not seek to ‘legislate’ from the bench, this should be left to the legislature and executive. To this end greater stress should be placed upon the rulings of lower courts. Typically restrained courts will have a smaller docket.
The Rehnquist Court is often defined as a restrained court. For example in Planned Parenthood v Casey, the court upheld the right to an abortion, continuing the decision of the Warren Court.
Generally speaking courts that are defined as restrained, tend to have a majority of conservative justices, who would favour the restrained approach to judicial rulings. Contrasting to this is Judicial Activism which is a label that would typically be applied to more liberal courts.
You might also like
Filibuster
Study Notes
Congressional Override
Study Notes
Judicial Activism
Study Notes
Swing State
Study Notes
US Political Advert Round Up
17th January 2016
Medicare Improvement Act 2003
Study Notes
The US Presidential Election in Under 2 Minutes
9th November 2016
Developing politics knowledge beyond the classroom. Part two: MOOCs
12th November 2020