AS revision: UK pressure groups and democracy

Fathers4Justice is a student favourite when it comes to pressure groups, and they are often highlighted (wrongly) as an example of the effectiveness of direct action. This form of activity is inevitably a sign of weakness rather than strength and there is no evidence of F4J having changed the law on access fathers are granted in custodial disputes.

Pressure groups are said to boost democracy by having an educative effect and raising awareness about important issues. But here F4J may in fact be guilty of distorting the democratic process…

As a report in the Times states, fathers were granted access to their children either full or part time in 48% of cases last year. This therefore gives the lie to the idea that the law is biased and the courts are somehow institutionally pro mothers.

Far from providing evident of F4J changing the way courts behave, the figures are said to reflect the increased role fathers play in family life. Further, it is resistance on behalf of the parent with the care of the child in granting access, not the courts.

It will be interesting to hear the perspective of Matt O’Connor, the founder of F4J, when he speaks at this summer’s tutor2u Politics Conference!