Study Notes
Merger Policy in the UK and the European Union
- Level:
- A-Level
- Board:
- AQA, Edexcel, OCR, IB
Last updated 22 Mar 2021
Corporate restructuring is a fact of life. There is a natural tendency for markets to consolidate over take through a process of horizontal and vertical integration.
The main issue for competition policy is whether a proposed merger or takeover between two businesses is thought to lead to a substantial lessening of competitive pressures in the market and risks leading to a level of market concentration when collusive behaviour might become a reality.
When companies combine via a merger, an acquisition or the creation of a joint venture, this generally has a positive impact on markets: firms usually become more efficient, competition intensifies and the final consumer will benefit from higher-quality goods at fairer prices.
However, mergers which create or strengthen a dominant market position can, after investigation, be prohibited in order to prevent ensuing abuses. Acquiring a dominant position by buying out competitors is in contravention of EU competition law. Companies are usually able to address the competition problems, normally by offering to divest (sell or off-load) part of their businesses. For example, in 2007, the UK Competition Commission decided that Sky would be forced to sell some of its 17.9% stake in ITV.
You might also like
Royal Mail in the dock over delivery charges
29th July 2015
Jean Tirole and the Nobel Prize | Nobel Plenary
6th November 2015
Sky takeover bid to be settled by auction
21st September 2018
Advantages and Drawbacks of Horizontal Integration
Topic Videos
Leveraged buy-outs - How to buy a £6.8bn supermarket for £780m
16th February 2021
Sky High Vet Bills - CMA Launches Formal Probe
12th March 2024