Study Notes

IB Economics - Trade Protection: Arguments For and Against

Level:
IB
Board:
IB

Last updated 8 Sept 2024

This study note for IB Economics covers: Trade Protection: Arguments For and Against

Trade protection refers to government policies and measures aimed at restricting or regulating international trade, primarily to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. These policies include tariffs, quotas, subsidies, and other non-tariff barriers. While trade protection can offer benefits, it also carries significant downsides. Let's delve into the arguments for and against trade protection, examining each in detail with relevant examples and applications.

Arguments in Favour of Trade Protection

1. Protection of Domestic Jobs

  • Rationale: By imposing tariffs or quotas on imports, domestic industries are shielded from foreign competition, which helps to maintain local employment levels.
  • Example: The U.S. imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports in 2018, aiming to protect American jobs in these industries. While it did help some workers, it also increased costs for industries relying on these materials.
  • Critical View: Although it saves jobs in the short term, in the long run, it may lead to inefficiencies and higher costs, impacting the economy overall.

2. National Security

  • Rationale: Protecting industries critical to national security (like defense and technology) ensures that a country is not dependent on foreign suppliers during times of conflict or tension.
  • Example: The U.S. restrictions on Huawei and other Chinese tech firms are partially motivated by national security concerns, aiming to protect data and infrastructure.
  • Critical View: Defining what counts as a "national security" industry can be contentious, and such protection can be misused for broader economic protectionism.

3. Protection of Infant Industries

  • Rationale: New industries in developing countries may lack the economies of scale and experience to compete against established foreign firms. Temporary protection allows them to grow until they can compete on a global scale.
  • Example: South Korea and Taiwan used protectionist policies in the mid-20th century to nurture their automotive and electronics industries, which later became globally competitive.
  • Critical View: Temporary protection often becomes permanent, leading to complacency and inefficiency. It can also be difficult to determine which industries genuinely need protection.

4. Maintenance of Health, Safety, and Environmental Standards

  • Rationale: Import restrictions can prevent the entry of goods that do not meet domestic health, safety, or environmental standards, protecting consumers and the environment.
  • Example: The European Union bans certain chemicals and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food imports that do not meet its strict standards.
  • Critical View: Such standards can be used as a guise for protectionism, with the real aim being to limit competition rather than protect consumers.

5. Anti-Dumping and Unfair Competition

  • Rationale: Dumping occurs when foreign producers sell goods below cost in another country to undermine local businesses. Trade protection can counteract this practice and ensure fair competition.
  • Example: In 2021, the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on Chinese aluminum extrusions to protect European producers from undercutting.
  • Critical View: Proving dumping is complex and often leads to lengthy legal battles. Moreover, such measures can provoke retaliatory tariffs.

6. Balance of Payments Deficit

  • Rationale: By restricting imports, a country can reduce its trade deficit, improving its balance of payments position.
  • Example: Argentina has used various import restrictions to manage its recurring balance of payments issues.
  • Critical View: While it may provide short-term relief, such policies can lead to retaliation and reduce the country’s access to foreign markets, exacerbating long-term trade issues.

7. Source of Government Revenue

  • Rationale: Tariffs generate revenue for the government, which can be especially valuable for developing countries with limited taxation capabilities.
  • Example: In many African countries, import tariffs represent a significant portion of government revenue due to the difficulty in collecting other forms of taxes.
  • Critical View: Over-reliance on tariffs can distort market dynamics and discourage trade, which is essential for economic growth.

Arguments Against Trade Protection

1. Misallocation of Resources

  • Rationale: Trade protection disrupts the principle of comparative advantage, leading to inefficient resource allocation where resources are not used in the most productive ways.
  • Example: The U.S. sugar industry is heavily protected, leading to domestic prices that are significantly higher than the world market. This protection benefits a small number of producers at the expense of consumers and other industries.
  • Critical View: By preventing market forces from operating freely, protectionist measures reduce overall economic efficiency.

2. Risk of Retaliation and Trade Wars

  • Rationale: When one country imposes trade barriers, others are likely to retaliate, leading to a cycle of escalating tariffs and restrictions that can severely impact global trade.
  • Example: The U.S.-China trade war, starting in 2018, saw both nations imposing multiple rounds of tariffs on each other’s goods, disrupting global supply chains and slowing global economic growth.
  • Critical View: Trade wars can harm both consumers and producers, leading to a no-win situation where economic growth is stifled globally.

3. Potential for Corruption

  • Rationale: Protectionist policies can create opportunities for corruption, as businesses may seek to influence policy to gain protection from competition.
  • Example: In some developing countries, import licenses and quotas have been associated with bribery and corruption, where businesses pay to secure favorable treatment.
  • Critical View: Such practices erode trust in the economic system and lead to unfair advantages for well-connected firms.

4. Increased Costs of Production

  • Rationale: Without foreign competition, domestic industries may become complacent, leading to inefficiencies and higher production costs due to a lack of innovation and pressure to reduce costs.
  • Example: Japan’s protection of its rice industry results in domestic prices that are much higher than global prices, affecting the overall cost of living.
  • Critical View: High production costs due to protectionism can reduce a country’s global competitiveness in the long run.

5. Higher Prices for Consumers

  • Rationale: Protectionist measures often lead to higher prices for consumers as they have to pay more for domestic goods compared to potentially cheaper imports.
  • Example: The U.S. tariffs on washing machines in 2018 led to a significant increase in prices for U.S. consumers, with some estimates suggesting a rise of up to 12%.
  • Critical View: Higher consumer prices reduce purchasing power and overall welfare, disproportionately affecting lower-income households.

6. Increased Costs of Imported Factors of Production

  • Rationale: Tariffs on imported raw materials or components can increase production costs for domestic industries, making them less competitive.
  • Example: U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum have increased costs for American car manufacturers, reducing their competitiveness both domestically and internationally.
  • Critical View: Protection of one sector often leads to unintended consequences in others, highlighting the interconnected nature of modern economies.

7. Reduced Export Competitiveness

  • Rationale: Protectionist policies can provoke retaliation from other countries, leading to reduced access to foreign markets for exporters.
  • Example: The European Union’s tariffs on U.S. products in response to American steel tariffs affected American agricultural and industrial exports, reducing their competitiveness abroad.
  • Critical View: Limiting access to foreign markets can have a long-term negative impact on a country's economic growth and employment levels in export-oriented sectors.

Glossary of Key Terms

  • Anti-Dumping: Measures taken to prevent the selling of goods below cost to gain unfair market share.
  • Balance of Payments: A financial statement that summarizes a country’s transactions with the rest of the world.
  • Comparative Advantage: The ability of a country to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another country.
  • Dumping: Selling products in a foreign market at lower prices than in the domestic market or below production cost.
  • Economies of Scale: Cost advantages that firms experience as their production scales up.
  • Infant Industry: A new industry that may need protection from international competition until it becomes established and competitive.
  • Quota: A limit on the amount of a specific good that can be imported into a country.
  • Tariff: A tax imposed on imported goods, typically aimed at making foreign products more expensive to protect domestic industries.
  • Trade Deficit: Occurs when a country's imports exceed its exports.
  • Trade War: A situation where countries retaliate against each other's trade restrictions, leading to escalating barriers to trade.

Possible IB Economics Essay-Style Questions

  1. Discuss the arguments for and against trade protection, using examples to illustrate your points.
  2. Evaluate the impact of protectionist policies on domestic consumers and producers.
  3. To what extent do you agree that protectionism is necessary for the protection of infant industries?
  4. Analyze the effects of trade wars on the global economy with reference to recent examples.
  5. Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of trade protection for developing countries.

Recent Real-World Data and Examples

  • U.S.-China Trade War: The trade war between the U.S. and China saw tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of goods, significantly impacting global supply chains. It led to an estimated $316 billion in lost GDP globally by 2020.
  • EU Anti-Dumping Measures: The European Union has actively used anti-dumping duties, including on Chinese bicycles and steel products, to protect European manufacturers.
  • Argentina’s Import Restrictions: In response to economic crises, Argentina frequently imposes import restrictions to improve its balance of payments, although these measures often lead to shortages and higher prices domestically.

Retrieval Questions for A-Level Students

  1. What is the primary goal of trade protection measures?
  2. List three arguments in favour of trade protection.
  3. Explain how tariffs can lead to higher prices for domestic consumers.
  4. What is dumping, and why do countries impose anti-dumping duties?
  5. How might protectionist policies lead to a misallocation of resources?

This comprehensive guide offers a detailed exploration of trade protection, catering to IB and undergraduate economics students. The balance of theoretical understanding, real-world application, and critical thinking exercises equips students with the tools to grasp the complexities of international trade policies.

© 2002-2024 Tutor2u Limited. Company Reg no: 04489574. VAT reg no 816865400.