In the News
Piouvian Taxes - Tesco chicken supplier and pollution in the River Wye
5th February 2023
A very localised example here of a negative production externality, with algal blooms on the River Wye being attributed to the activities of poultry producer, Avara Foods.
As a result, campaigners are arguing that the company should be held responsible for the costs of cleaning up the river, internalising the externality. It is the optimal Pigouvian solution.
I've no doubt though that Avara will argue that others also contribute to the marine pollution and thus calculating the extent to which individual firms, and farmers, would need to contribute would be difficult.
You might also like
Optimum “health tax” for meat calculated
8th November 2018
Chief Medical Officer calls for extended sugar and salt bans
21st December 2018
UK Plastic bag charge set to be doubled to 10p
27th December 2018
Market Failure - Match Up Knowledge Retrieval Activity
Quizzes & Activities
Pigouvian Taxes - Beyond Meat boss backs tax on meat consumption
3rd August 2021
What is the Polluter Pays Principle?
Study Notes