In the News
Nurofen fined heavily for mis-leading consumers
16th December 2016
Another instance of the regulator intervening to protect consumers from exploitation by another pharmaceutical company. In this instance, the manufacturer of Nurofen, Reckitt Benckiser, has seen its fine increase from $1.7m to $6m, for misleading branding of identical products.
Nurofen maker's fine for misleading consumers increased from $1.7m to $6m https://t.co/htbLCCqaNc
— The Guardian (@guardian) December 16, 2016
My take on this? Don't buy Nurofen in the first place - generic ibuprofen is identical. However, that said, some studies suggest that pricier painkillers are 'better' at providing pain relief - if only because of their psychosomatic effects.
The makers of Nurofen have been hit with a $6 million fine for misleading consumers. @RobertOvadia https://t.co/C3TJ3jeA8A #7News pic.twitter.com/8eFAher0TP
— 7NEWS Queensland (@7NewsBrisbane) December 16, 2016
You might also like
Supply-Side Economics - Product Market Reforms
Study Notes
Monopoly - Price Discrimination
Study Notes

Labels are for cans not for people
12th July 2015
The Bots Are Taking Over!
24th February 2016
Conditions to enable Price Discrimination
Topic Videos
Priming (Behavioural Economics)
Topic Videos
Government Failure - Wood Energy Schemes and Climate Change
23rd February 2017

RIP Monty Hall
12th October 2017
Daily Email Updates
Subscribe to our daily digest and get the day’s content delivered fresh to your inbox every morning at 7am.
Signup for emails