Explanations
Counter-intuitive effects of fuel subsidies in Madagascar
14th September 2019
The World Bank looks at how the Malagasy government has spent a significant amount subsidising fuel.
This excellent World Bank clip looks at the effects of this, and concludes that such an intervention is most beneficial for the rich who consume the most electricity - often from fuel-powered generators, the most fuel for transportation and processed food, another good that is energy-intensive.
As a result, the World Bank is seeking to reduce the government's involvement in the market for fuel and promote efficient market outcomes. A lovely example of why government intervention can have counter-intuitive effect.
You might also like
Maximum Prices (Government Intervention)
Study Notes
Solar industry attacks UK energy policy
18th October 2015
Calculation worksheet for Indirect tax and subsidies
6th April 2016
Evaluating the pub smoking ban
1st October 2017
Edexcel Theme 3 Micro Knowledge Book - Government Intervention
Quizzes & Activities
Subsidies - 2021 Revision Update
Study Notes